Morning worship – 26
August 2012 led by the Rev Dr Graham Adams
Reflection 1: Ambassadors in chains
I love the phrase that Paul uses at the end of that
passage – about him being an ‘ambassador in chains’. (or in the GNB: ‘an ambassador … in prison’)
In his case there was something very literal about
it, being that he was in prison,
but as our opening words from the prophet Zechariah
reminded us,
there’s a sense in which we are all ‘prisoners of hope’
as well as ‘ambassadors in chains’:
because we have our dreams, our goals, the things
we long to see happen,
but things hold us back – we remain prisoners,
restricted by certain chains,
whether physical limitations, or lack of
self-esteem, or money, or Olympic skill -
so even if we see ourselves as a potential world
champion at javelin-throwing
we may know deep inside it will never happen … if
we don’t have a javelin.
Life holds us back, and sometimes seems to squash
our dreams.
It’s because of that sense of limitation that Paul
asks for people’s prayers:
we too need each other’s prayers, and
encouragement, and support, and love,
far more than we need each other’s criticism, and
discouragement;
so although we need to know if we’re deluding
ourselves about what we could do
most people suffer more from a lack of self-belief,
so let us be encouraging.
But what about these chains? What might we achieve
without them?
The Gospel story itself may have the opposite
effect from the one it intends
if we focus so much on our inability to move
mountains that we feel powerless;
so we need to recover the meaning here –
after all, I doubt when Jesus urged us never to
have a doubt in our hearts,
I doubt he meant we should never doubt!
For elsewhere he praised those whose faith is only
the size of a mustard seed,
so it’s not about the quantity of faith we have, or
how strong we think we are,
but what our faith is directed towards.
In fact, I’m a big believer in doubting – it’s very
healthy, it’s a sign of honesty,
and God is big enough to absorb all of our doubts;
so when Jesus urges us to have ‘no doubts in our
hearts’, the context is specific:
he is presenting us with a choice, between two
different ways of believing,
two different kinds
of faith – one which produces unhealthy fruit, one good fruit;
one which ties us up with more & more chains;
one which helps to set us free.
So which will we choose?
But before I expand on that, it’s worth noting that
even though Paul was in chains
& even though many of us frequently feel
inhibited, not quite fulfilling our goals,
still many amazing things are achieved – so the
chains need not get the better of us!
In fact, we live in a world so attuned to the bad
news, that we often overlook
all the many subtle ways in which even people who
are desperately up against it
manage to bring about small victories in the causes of justice and peace.
So let’s not lose sight of the courage of people,
both far away & close to home,
as they dare to confront a predicament, persevere,
& bring some good to fruition.
This happens on a global scale,
when campaigns set prisoners of conscience free, or
empower those in poverty,
or companies or governments are held to account for
their misbehaviour,
but also when people with illnesses or who suffer
domestic violence or abuse
show unbelievable fortitude & resilience.
The human spirit can be amazing, whether people
believe it is God-given or not,
and we should simply give thanks for the small acts
of kindness,
the heroic bravery of people standing up for the
rights and dignity of others,
or anything which shows us that, even though we are
in chains in so many ways,
still much good & beauty & hope &
healing can be achieved & often is.
We would do well, also, to recognise that when we
think we are free
(because we like to think of ourselves as
independent and self-sufficient),
even so we remain under the influence of subtle
forces which shape our lives –
so none of us can ever achieve some kind of state
of innocence, unsullied by it all:
for we do live with chains, we are part of structures
and systems which do harm others,
we cannot pretend to stay aloof from it all;
in fact, rather than refusing to get our hands
dirty in the real world,
we should accept that compromise & messiness
are an inevitable part of things,
but even so we
can still strive to make a difference – and every effort counts:
for even the greatest mountain becomes less
formidable
when many join together to move it!
So, basically, don’t be disheartened by the scale
of the challenges we face
or the risk of compromise - should we dare to get
stuck in & get our hands dirty,
because although we remain ‘in chains’, as
prisoners of hope, not entirely free,
or our actions not as pure as we’d like,
still we contribute to something better and we do
make a difference
as ambassadors of a new world which begins to take
shape
even in the shadow of the mountain itself.
Reflection 2: Moving Mountains
So what of the choice between two different ways of
believing?
Remember, the context was specific:
Jesus had just undertaken his most direct attack on
the Temple
establishment yet
which most historians accept would have been the
ultimate trigger for his arrest.
So this wasn’t just about clearing a space to have
some quiet prayer –
it was a direct challenge to the whole system which
the Temple
represented:
namely the purity code, which taught that people
were unclean because of sin
and that only the Temple could secure their forgiveness &
make them clean,
but they had to pay, to make a sacrifice, which
meant using the Temple
currency
with an exchange rate which exploited them.
So the Temple
was not only a religious institution but political and economic –
at the heart of the way of life of the people,
which was about exclusion and exploitation,
and Jesus wasn’t the only Jewish teacher to see
this, but he brought the issues together.
And he struck at the heart of it – in an act
bravely designed strategically to cause trouble.
It’s with that in mind that we should read the
conversations surrounding it:
first, the cursing of a barren fig-tree, surely a
metaphor for the Temple
–
a creation which was not bearing good fruit, but
was morally withering instead,
as Mark’s account of those things shows us;
and secondly, the saying about having faith that
can move mountains,
because the Temple ,
being on the mountain, was associated with the mountain,
so any talk of throwing this mountain into the sea
was about throwing the Temple
…
the sheer audacity of it! No wonder the authorities
would want him dead.
The choice, then, becomes clear:
Have faith in God, Jesus says – not in the Temple , but directly in God.
Though the Temple
claimed to speak for God, to act in God’s name,
Jesus undermined this claim, and opened up an
alternative possibility:
The people would have been taught the inevitability
of the Temple ’s
authority
and to doubt that anything else could speak for
God.
But Jesus urged people not to doubt this! There was
another way! Believe it!
Have faith in
God – don’t doubt it – because the temple keeps you in chains;
but instead a kind of freedom is possible, which
throws the Temple
away,
and it makes all sorts of things possible which may
feel unlikely …
We may not have the same Temple in our day, but other things have
replaced it –
powers and structures and forces at work in our
world
which make us doubt that alternatives are really
possible,
which act as though they are ‘god’, supreme, beyond doubt, secure, eternal.
This is why institutions in the City of London must have loved
being called
‘the masters of the universe’ by politicians,
and relished the free rein they were given, as many
profited greatly from it too,
until the hollowness of their authority was exposed
and wider society bore the cost;
well-known media moguls also had their lengthy
stint as supreme Temples ;
but one by one, such Temples fall, mountains crumble –
so let’s not doubt it is possible to move these mountains, these temples,
to undermine their arrogance, and make the world
better.
Have faith in God, not in any of these pretenders, these
temples;
Have faith that even if we remain in chains, they
need not have the last word,
because God continues to do new things…
I’ve been invited to a conference in Brazil ,
organised by the World Council of Churches and the Council for World Mission,
with 70 theologians and economists coming together
to discuss the economic crisis and map out a better
way of organising things
to put limits on the power of human greed.
An exciting opportunity – which reflects the word
‘crisis’, both a trauma
and an opportunity to be seized, and I believe this
is a mountain-moving moment,
an opportunity for reform, if politicians can be
persuaded to take it on our behalf,
to help shape the economy in a way which is less
about exclusion and exploitation
and more about God’s House being, as Jesus
proclaimed, ‘for all nations’.
So pray for the conference – and for all attempts
to seize moments of crisis
to help reform our own Temples and work for a fairer, more just
world.
So, for ourselves too, we’re faced with a choice
today:
Whether to opt for the kind of faith which believes
we’re better off
sticking with what we know;
we’re better off opting for the security which
comes when we accept
that our chains are inevitable;
that the world cannot really be any different,
things are as they always will be;
that we can never really flourish & others in
our world will never flourish either…
Or should we choose a different way of believing –
braver, riskier, but more alive?
Having faith in God, the living God whose love
makes new things possible?
Daring to imagine that injustices, violence,
brokenness can be overcome?
Because we see, as though through Jesus’ own eyes,
that faith is about imagination –
daring to imagine, to dream, to envisage
alternative, outrageous possibilities,
not to doubt that these temples or mountains might
even yet be moved!
Dare we, even if our faith is as fragile as a
mustard seed, or a fig tree,
envisage living as though our prayers are already answered:
that the mountains and temples and obstacles which
stand in our way
may not be as overwhelming as they appear?
Dare we have
faith in the God who helps us to move mountains?
No comments:
Post a Comment